A good friend recently attended a
top-level writing conference, one where you have to be approved to
enter. She was accepted and went with her manuscript in hand. She got
some expert feedback from one of the published writers who taught
there. She came home excited, shared the news with me. "He liked so
much of it, and he had some great comments for next steps," she said.
Her voice was full of enthusiasm and energy to tackle the changes.
Weeks passed. I emailed her to find out how the revision was going.
She'd gotten sick, the kids had gotten sick, politics were making her
crazy, in-laws had visited, spring vacation arrived. No time for
writing, she said, knowing I'd understand.
I
did. Life comes up, gets in the way, changes our plans. That's
normal. But I also heard something else in her voice: overwhelm about
the feedback she'd received. It was extensive, it came from someone who
really knew what he was doing, and although it excited her, it also got
her inner critic up in arms. She needed time to process the feedback
and that's also normal, but she'd waited so long to take even a small
step towards implementing it, she'd become strangers with her story.
That
was a shame. Because it's a good, even great, story, and she's an
excellent writer who could easily take it to the finish line.
I see this all the time. It's happened to me--often.
My
friend is a first-time author, though, so she doesn't realize the
danger she's in right now. We've discussed, she's avowed it wasn't the
feedback at all (recall the illnesses, holidays, visitors). She's good
with that, she's happy with the suggestions.
But, I thought, why isn't she writing? That's the real proof of it: if we write or if we don't.
Feedback
is useless unless you do something with it. So how does a writer not
give up when she gets feedback--even expert, excellent feedback?
Feedback
creates questions. It's supposed to. It's designed to put cracks in
the structure you've so carefully built to house your story. It's
supposed to show where that structure has weaknesses or could be
stronger. It's supposed to raise questions about the characters'
motivations or the use of setting details or time markers or plot
logic. One of my most troubling pieces of feedback, recently received
from a beloved editor, was "I'm troubled by the logic here." Another
way of saying, "As a reader, I stopped believing the story just here."
Super valuable to know about. But what do you do with such a comment? How do you keep writing?
Below
is my step-by-step method for making good use of feedback. It requires
two lists, but they have saved me many times. And I have finished and
published books to prove it works. Try it, if you wish, and see if it
works for you!
Your Weekly Writing Exercise: Feedback List and To-Do List for Revision
When
you get feedback from readers, writers group, classmates, or editors,
set aside an hour or two where you have quiet to think. You're going to
make two lists: a feedback list and a to-do list. Start with the
feedback list.
1. Make a
list of ALL the feedback, even small changes suggested, even stuff you
don't agree with. (I usually put the questionable comments at the end
of the list.) Don't worry about making the list in any order--it
doesn't matter. Mix large and small changes. This can take time. Its
purpose is to help your brain absorb each item individually, reducing
the sheer overwhelm. As you write the list, you may get ideas or
solutions to the concerns of your reader/editor. See below.
2.
I like to put the ideas/solutions on a separate piece of paper or
document. This becomes my to-do list. It's much more proactive and
inspiring than the feedback, which is all stuff that doesn't quite
work. The ideas/solutions are the stuff that could work, if I try it.
3.
If you don't get ideas when you're writing the first list, don't sweat
it. It can take time for the inner critic's reaction (oh no! might as
well give up!) to settle down.
4.
Once you have the list as complete as possible, choose the EASIEST item
to work on first. Make that change in your draft. Cross it off your
feedback list.
5. Find the
next easiest item; work on that. Cross it off. Keep going. Save the
huge global changes for last unless you get an equally huge brainstorm
and want to dive in.
6. Some
changes, even small ones, have a ripple effect. Rather than pausing to
address another idea while you're changing the first one, write the new
idea on your to-do list. It'll keep. It makes most writers crazy (at
least, it does me) to multi-task too much at revision. We tend to lose
threads that way. Stay with what you're working on, finish it, cross it
off, then go to the next item.
No comments:
Post a Comment