Publishers
buy manuscripts when they communicate passion for a topic, presented in
a unique way that speaks to a reader. To get this passion, revision
lets the emotional truths we've learned during the process of writing
this particular story come forward. We revise to make this truth as
unimpeded and clear as we can.
It's
a bit like cleaning a window to let more light in, or as
Pulitzer-prize-winning author Wallace Stegner said, "All you want in
the finished print is the clean statement of the lens, which is
yourself, on the subject that has been absorbing your attention."
Another
way of looking at this: Revision's goal is to let the manuscript become
strong enough to stand on its own without the author having to make any
interpretations.
In my writing classes we talk about "getting out of the room" and
letting your book and its readers have that wonderful conversation that
all good literature fosters. Without you, the author, having to be there
to make sure the reader is getting it.
This
concept was frightening to Tom, a first-time book writer, who wondered,
What will happen to my theories if I'm not there to explain them? Or
worse: If it changes entirely-will it still be mine? Will revision cause
it to lose its original spark?
This is where Tom was stuck.
Content Analysis--The First Step
For
me, the refinement that comes in revision lets in the real music of a
book. There's a sense of multiple sections in an orchestra finally
playing together. They create a sound larger than any individual part.
But
to get this richness of sound, Tom needed to look at revision in each
of its three aspects, and in this order: first content, then structure,
then language.
This
week's post talks about the first step--content analysis. To read
about structure and language revision, check out chapter 19 in my book Your Book Starts Here.
Content
is the foundation of any book. It's the plot in fiction, the defining
events in memoir, the information in nonfiction. There's a certain
amount that must be present for the book to make sense to a reader. In a
writer's head, the content is there. But when revising for content, you
want to make sure it's also on the page.
So we take an inventory of the book's content.
I
like to do it in two stages. I start with the whole manuscript,
reviewing the table of contents or my storyboard of topics. Does each
larger section have substance?
If
yes, I examine the book's chapters and the material within each
chapter, looking for any parts that feel incomplete, where information
is missing or extraneous.
It
is in content revision that you'll discover if you are a naturally
contracting or expanding writer. Do you prematurely edit your "islands"
too much, so that the first draft feels more like a brief sketch, with
sentences counted out like coins? If so, the richness of your book's
sound may be underdeveloped and content revision will show you where you
need to expand your story.
Or
maybe you feel unsure about whether your reader will get the picture
you're trying to paint, so you add a bit more than is really needed. You
sense it doesn't contribute to the story's flow but you're worried
about leaving it out. You may need to take a deep breath and choose to
delete some content. Less is sometimes more in content revision.
Your Questions List
So,
as you read for content, you are going to see problems. You will be
tempted to make notes on your manuscript, such as, "fix this
description" or "make dialogue longer."
Don't do this. Why?
Because
it will turn your manuscript into a deadening list of chores that can
stop you in your tracks. Instead, craft the problems you see as
questions.
The
first task I asked Tom to try was the questions list. A list of
questions will automatically put a writer in the position of curious
observer, the fascinated inquirer. They allow you to become open to new
ideas that maybe you weren't ready to grasp during the planning and
writing stages of your book journey. And questions always attract
answers-in a truly synchronous way.
Some examples of content questions from Tom and my other students:
* Does the reader need to know more in chapter 2 about listening skills?
* How does John get from the cabin to downtown Poughkeepsie? Do I need to add a
traveling scene as transition?
* Which of Mary's phone calls is most important to the plot? (This writer saw the need to
delete one.)
* How can I best explain the backstory on page 45 in fewer pages?
The Extras File
As
I review each chapter during content revision, often I find material
that is missing--but equally often, material that has to go.
All that work! I'd spent weeks on some of those paragraphs.
Rather
than just delete them, I open a new document on my computer. I name it
"Extras." It becomes the holding tank for excess sentences, phrases, and
paragraphs I still love but don't serve the manuscript. (Once I even
put four chapters in my Extras file!)
It
always makes me feel better to know I am not throwing these gems away
forever. They are safe in my computer, waiting for their right place.
Not
surprisingly, I find myself using them later-during other parts of the
revision process, for example, when I need a bit more backstory or
another line of dialogue.
Want to hear more about the content analysis exercise, step by step, and what it's done for other writers?
Your Weekly Writing Exercise
1. Skim through each chapter of your manuscript;
then, at the top of the chapter’s title page, write one sentence that describes
the meat of that chapter—its purpose in the larger story. Continue until you
have all chapters described.
2. Carefully read these sentences in sequence. Are there any places
where you see missing steps or scenes that would be needed to make your story
flow better for a reader? Are there any places where you’ve added unnecessary
material? This may show you exactly where you need to expand or contract.
3. Now open to a new page in your writer’s notebook.
On the top of the page write “Content Questions.” List what you discovered during
your review, but write these problems as questions, as in the examples on the
previous page.